Overview
March 1โ€“31, 2026
DT

Team Overview

March 2026 ยท 6 developers ยท 22 working days

๐Ÿ“‹
Total Tasks
589
Across 6 members
โœ…
Completed
406
โ†‘ 68.9% rate
โณ
Est. Hours
793h
Planned effort
๐Ÿ•
Actual Hours
950h
โ–ฒ +156.6h over
โšก
Efficiency
83%
Est รท Actual hrs
๐Ÿ”ด
Overrun Tasks
185
31.6% of tasks
๐Ÿ”
Multi-Day Tasks
94
Continued next day
๐Ÿ“‰
Over-Estimated
85
Finished < 50% of est.
Status Breakdown
Done โ€” 406
In Progress โ€” 81
In Review โ€” 48
Pending โ€” 42
Query โ€” 4
Dependent โ€” 1

Task Status Distribution

Planned vs Unplanned Tasks

Team โ€” Estimated vs Actual Hours

Team Insights

Automated findings from March 2026 data including multi-day task and estimation analysis

๐Ÿ”ด Critical Alerts

๐Ÿšจ
260.7 hours lost to time overruns โ€” 185 of 585 tasks took longer than planned. The team spent ~33 extra working days beyond estimates in a single month.
๐Ÿ”
94 tasks spanned multiple days โ€” many tasks estimated at 1h actually took 8โ€“32h across days. The biggest: Kashish's invoice testing task was estimated 0.5h but accumulated 32.1h over 17 days. Tasks should be tracked as continuing, not re-entered each day.
๐Ÿ”ฅ
Kashish Luhar highest overrun risk โ€” 54 overrun tasks, 75.6h extra, avg 119.6% over estimate. Multi-day task analysis shows even more hidden overruns not visible in single-day view.
โš ๏ธ
Jay Gajjar's PR review tasks severely underestimated โ€” March 16 Ex Grip ERP task: estimated 2h โ†’ took 8.5h (+325%). Same pattern Mar 17 (2h โ†’ 8.25h). This is a systematic underestimation of PR review complexity.

๐ŸŸก Estimation Quality Warnings

๐Ÿ“Š
85 tasks were over-estimated โ€” finished in less than 50% of the time allocated. Total wasted buffer: ~80h of padding that could have been used for planning. Krina accounts for 28% of over-estimations.
๐Ÿ“…
Ex Grip ERP module has systemic estimation failure โ€” accounts for 156.5h of overruns AND 8 of the top 20 over-estimations. Tasks in this module need calibrated benchmarks, not fresh estimates each time.
๐Ÿ•
Half-day occurrences detected 4 times โ€” Krina (Mar 04, Mar 09), Chitra (Mar 10), Jay (Mar 11) logged under 5.5h on-site. These days show significantly fewer completed tasks and may indicate health, personal, or external blockers.
โฐ
5 late arrivals recorded โ€” Kashish (Mar 02: 10:31), Chitra (Mar 16: 10:20), Sanskar (Mar 16: 10:30, Mar 27: 11:00), Krina (Mar 04: 12:30). Sanskar's Mar 27 arrival at 11:00 is the latest of the month.

๐ŸŸข Positive Highlights

๐Ÿ†
Kartavya Gohil leads completion at 88.8% โ€” 95 of 107 tasks done with only 18 overruns. Best on-time delivery in the team despite complex VAS module work.
โšก
Krina Patel is the only member ahead of estimates โ€” 102.8% efficiency. Completes tasks in less time than planned on average, indicating accurate self-assessment.
๐Ÿ“ˆ
Mar 17 was the best day โ€” 32 of 35 tasks completed (91.4%). Team also stayed late on Mar 06 (Jay: 21:00), Mar 16 (Jay: 20:20, Kashish: 20:16), and Mar 17 (Chitra: 20:05) to push deliverables.

๐Ÿ’ก Recommendations

๐ŸŽฏ
Introduce "task continuation" tagging โ€” when a task is not completed same day, mark it as continuing (not create a new row). This will give accurate total effort per task and expose real overruns hidden by day-by-day entries.
๐Ÿ“‹
Add 3ร— buffer to Ex Grip ERP tasks โ€” PDF generation, repeater UI, and PR review tasks in this module consistently take 2โ€“5ร— estimated time. Create a module-level estimation template.
๐Ÿ“‰
Review over-estimated tasks quarterly โ€” 85 tasks finished in under half the allocated time. These inflated estimates are masking capacity and making sprint velocity unreliable. Use actuals to recalibrate future estimates.
๐Ÿ“Œ
Reduce unplanned work below 25% โ€” currently at 39.4%. Introduce a buffer sprint slot to absorb reactive tasks without disrupting planned capacity.

Team Members

Individual performance for March 2026

Tasks Done vs Total

Est. vs Actual Hours

Member-Wise Insights

Strengths, concerns, and actions for each team member

Multi-Day Task Analysis

Tasks that continued across consecutive days โ€” showing true total hours vs day-1 estimate

๐Ÿ“Œ How This Works

โ„น๏ธ
Since tasks are assigned for completion same-day, any task appearing on multiple days means it was not completed as planned. The real overrun = Total actual hours across all days โˆ’ Day 1 estimate. Single-day analysis misses these hidden overruns.
๐Ÿšจ
Top hidden overrun: Kashish's invoice testing task โ€” estimated 0.5h on Day 1, accumulated 32.1h across 17 days (Mar 25 โ†’ Mar 30). A 6,320% real overrun that would look like a 0.1h overrun when viewed day-by-day.
โš ๏ธ
Jay's streaming issue (anycall) took 28.5h across 8 days โ€” estimated at 1h. The task is still In Progress. This single task represents a significant unresolved technical blocker.
Multi-Day Tasks
94
Tasks spanning 2+ days
Biggest Real Overrun
+31.6h
Kashish ยท invoice testing
Still Open
26
Multi-day tasks unresolved
Max Days Span
17
Days for single task
Most Affected
Chitra
Most multi-day tasks
Avg Days/Task
3.2
Days per multi-day task

All Multi-Day Tasks โ€” Real Effort vs Day-1 Estimate

Member Dates (from โ†’ to) Days Module Task Day-1 Est Total Actual Real Overrun โ†“ Status

Time Overrun Analysis

185 single-day tasks exceeded their estimates in March 2026

๐Ÿ”ด Overrun Insights

๐Ÿ“Œ
Ex Grip ERP caused 156.5h of overruns โ€” 60% of all overrun hours. PDF generation, currency sign fixes, and repeater UI tasks average 2.8ร— their estimate.
๐Ÿ”
PR reviews are the #1 underestimated task type โ€” Jay's PR review tasks estimated 2h but consistently ran 8+ hours. Codebase complexity is not being factored into review estimates.
๐Ÿ’ก
Chitra Rathod has the most controlled overruns โ€” only 17.4h across 31 tasks (avg +0.56h/task). Her overruns are small and manageable.
Overrun Tasks
185
31.6% of total
Hours Lost
260.7h
Extra beyond estimates
Worst Task
+6.5h
Jay ยท Ex Grip ERP
Max % Over
530%
Krina ยท SPR Roadway
Most Affected
Kashish
54 tasks ยท 75.6h
On-Time Tasks
400
68.4% on time
Member Risk Summary

Overrun Hours by Member

Overrun vs On-Time Tasks

Top Modules by Overrun Hours

Severity Distribution

All Overrun Tasks

SevMemberDateModuleTaskEstActualOverrun โ†“% OverStatus

Over-Estimated Tasks

85 tasks finished in less than 50% of their allocated time โ€” estimation needs calibration

๐Ÿ“‰ What This Means

๐Ÿ“Š
85 tasks had actual time less than 50% of their estimate โ€” these tasks were allocated far more time than needed. While this looks good on surface, over-estimation inflates capacity buffers, makes sprint velocity unreliable, and suggests developers may be padding estimates.
๐Ÿ’ก
Possible reasons: Tasks were interrupted and resumed (time gaps), task was simpler than expected, developer underestimated own speed, or tasks with 0 actual hours were listed as done without time tracking.
โœ…
Positive view: Krina Patel's 102.8% efficiency is partly explained by her strong task completion in under estimated time โ€” she's genuinely fast, not just under-reporting.
๐Ÿšจ
17 tasks logged 0 actual hours โ€” but are marked Done or In Progress. These need to be investigated: were they forgotten, batched, or mis-logged? Zero-hour completions skew efficiency metrics significantly.
Over-Est Tasks
85
Finished < 50% of est.
Zero-Hour Tasks
17
0h logged, marked done
Hours Saved
~80h
Buffer not needed
Most Over-Est
Krina Patel
28% of over-estimates

All Over-Estimated Tasks (Actual < 50% of Estimate)

MemberDateModuleTaskEstimateActual% UsedSavedStatus

Clock-In / Clock-Out Report

Daily attendance, punctuality, and on-site hours for March 2026

๐Ÿ“‹ Reporting Summary

โฐ
5 late arrivals recorded โ€” Kashish (Mar 02: 10:31), Chitra (Mar 16: 10:20), Sanskar (Mar 16: 10:30), Krina (Mar 04: 12:30), Sanskar (Mar 27: 11:00). Late defined as after 10:05 AM.
๐Ÿ 
4 potential half-day instances โ€” Krina (Mar 04: 1h on-site, Mar 09: 5.35h), Chitra (Mar 10: 4.55h), Jay (Mar 11: 3.05h). On-site hours under 5.5h flagged as possible half-day.
๐Ÿ’ช
Extended hours noted โ€” Jay (Mar 06: stayed until 21:00), Jay+Kashish (Mar 16 until 20:20/20:16), Chitra (Mar 17 until 20:05). Team shows commitment during deadline periods.
๐Ÿ“Š
Average on-site time โ€” team average is 9.3h/day. Standard reporting window appears to be ~09:40 to 19:15. Members reporting before 09:30 include Krina (earliest: 09:05 on Mar 03).
Late Arrivals
5
After 10:05 AM
Half Days
4
Under 5.5h on-site
Avg On-Site
9.3h
Per member per day
Extended Days
5
Stayed past 20:00
Member Reporting Summary

Full Clock-In / Clock-Out Log

DateMemberClock InClock OutOn-Site HrsLate?Early Out?Half Day?

Module Breakdown

Project and module-wise task distribution

Actual Hours by Module (Top 10)

Tasks โ€” Done vs Total

Module Detail

ModuleTasksDoneCompletionActual Hrs

Leave & Breaks

Leave days and break hours for March 2026

Break Hours by Member

Leave Days by Member

๐Ÿ“‹ Notes

๐Ÿ“…
Sanskar Bagh took 3 leave days โ€” highest in the team. Despite this, delivered 63 completed tasks (64.9% rate).
โ˜•
Break hours range from 16.25h (Sanskar) to 21.45h (Kartavya) โ€” averaging ~0.74โ€“0.98h/day. Consistent across the team. All break and leave data excluded from efficiency metrics.